Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3054 14
Original file (NR3054 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
RED ADTMENT OF THE NAVY

eer ee

anaphn EOP CORRECTION OF NAVA

 

701 S$. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

f

 

BAN
Docket No.NRO3054-14
10 October 2014

ate

This is in reference to your application for correction to your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section

1552).

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October
2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the
advisory opinion furnished by the survivor Benefit Plan Program
Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13) of 18 Jul 2014 copy of which

was provided to you on 11 August 2014, and is being pr

conscientious considerati
: : a: 3

found that the
ce

 

t existence of probable m
In making this determination, the Board x
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
been denied. The names and votes of the members of 1!
furnished upon request.

 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board

reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one

year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence

not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in

this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
records.

presumption of regularity attaches to all official
Ket No.NROS054~- 14

DOC

an otticiai nave

roa correction of an
the existence of

Consequently, when applying to
licant to demonstrate

the burden is on the app

record,
njustice.

probable material error or i

 

Jf Goel 3. ot =
ROBERT J. ONEILL
Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4022 14

    Original file (NR4022 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Additionally, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 1 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4396 14

    Original file (NR4396 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5864 14

    Original file (NR5864 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NT i] F THE NAVY ACO ADOTA wit in POARD FOR COR ection OF NAVAL REG! Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420 PERS-806 of 17 Jul 2014, @ copy of which was provided to you on 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4147 14

    Original file (NR4147 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval the burden is om the applicant record, probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14

    Original file (NR5107 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4400 14

    Original file (NR4400 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket MNo.NkKO44U0-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofiiciai naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4443 14

    Original file (NR4443 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6516 14

    Original file (NR6516 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior te making its decision in this case. Docket Wo.NKO6516-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an officiai faves record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4190 14

    Original file (NR4190 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3337 14

    Original file (NR3337 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO3337-14 10 October 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section L552 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in...